(Reuters) - A lower court ruled on June 1 that the decision to block
the voting rights was correct if there had been a suspicion of
acting in concert, but said it was not in a position to judge
whether or not the investors had acted together.
Rayet, which denies acting in concert, appealed the
judgment.
Read more at Reuters.com Mergers News
the voting rights was correct if there had been a suspicion of
acting in concert, but said it was not in a position to judge
whether or not the investors had acted together.
Rayet, which denies acting in concert, appealed the
judgment.
Read more at Reuters.com Mergers News
No comments:
Post a Comment